October 29, 2011
Who is afraid of whom?

Who is afraid of whom?

(Source: conquestofbread)

September 10, 2011
centerforinvestigativereporting:

From CIR’s homeland security reporter G.W. Schulz. See more of his reporting on our website America’s War Within.
ageofperil:

This amazing graphics package from the folks at Wired’s Danger Room blog goes a long way in illustrating the last 10 years of the war on terror. Data supporting the graphics are available for download so you can do your own analysis.

centerforinvestigativereporting:

From CIR’s homeland security reporter G.W. Schulz. See more of his reporting on our website America’s War Within.

ageofperil:

This amazing graphics package from the folks at Wired’s Danger Room blog goes a long way in illustrating the last 10 years of the war on terror. Data supporting the graphics are available for download so you can do your own analysis.

August 27, 2010
The Death of the Ball Turret Gunner

From Wikipedia:

The Death of the Ball Turret Gunner is a five-line poem by Randall Jarrell published in 1945. It is about the death of a gunner in a Sperry ball turret on a World War II American bomber aircraft.

From my mother’s sleep I fell into the State,
And I hunched in its belly till my wet fur froze.
Six miles from earth, loosed from its dream of life,
I woke to black flak and the nightmare fighters.
When I died they washed me out of the turret with a hose.

Jarrell, who served in the Army Air Force, provided the following explanatory note:

“A ball turret was a plexiglass sphere set into the belly of a B-17 or B-24, and inhabited by two .50 caliber machine guns and one man, a short small man. When this gunner tracked with his machine guns a fighter attacking his bomber from below, he revolved with the turret; hunched upsidedown in his little sphere. The fighters which attacked him were armed with cannon firing explosive shells. The hose was a steam hose.”

Reviewer, Leven M. Dawson, says that “The theme of Randall Jarrell’s ‘The Death of the Ball Turret Gunner’ is that institutionalized violence, or war, creates moral paradox, a condition in which acts repugnant to human nature become appropriate.”[1] Most commentators agree, calling the poem a condemnation of the dehumanizing powers of “the State”, which are most graphically exhibited by the violence of war.[2]